PEER REVIEW PROCESS AT RESEARCH CONFERENCE FOR VIETNAMESE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS (VIETRESCON 2025)

Peer review is vital to the quality of published research. VIETRESCON 2025 requires all conference papers go through the peer review process before accepted to be presented in the conference.

HOW DOES IT WORK?

Peer review is a process in which a scientific paper is evaluated by a group of professors or experts to make sure it meets the necessary standards for acceptance or proceeding publication.

The VIETRESCON 2025’s Technical Program Committee.

The Technical Program Committee collaborates to review and discuss submitted papers.

Review occurs during a fixed window of time. All authors are notified of the decision on their paper at expected time.

The Technical Program Committee Chair is ultimately responsible for the selection of every accepted paper.

The peer review process conducts single-anonymous review. In single-anonymous, the names of the reviewers are not shared with the author, but the reviewers are aware of the author’s identity.

This process ensures that the reviewer can give an honest and impartial evaluation of the paper.

WHAT ARE REVIEWERS LOOKING FOR?

During the peer review process, reviewers look for the following.

Scope: Is the paper appropriate for the relevant topics for high school students levels?

Innovation: Is this material distinct from previous publications?

Validity: Is the study well designed and executed?

Data: Are the data reported, analyzed, and interpreted correctly?

Clarity: Are the ideas expressed clearly, concisely, and logically?

Compliance: Are all ethical and publication requirements met?

Advancement: Is this a significant contribution to the field?

Use of AI Tools: Has AI (e.g., ChatGPT, image generation tools, code assistants) been used ethically and transparently in the research or writing process?

PEER REVIEW DECISIONS

VIETRESCON 2025 Conference peer review occurs within a scheduled time. All authors are notified of the peer review decision on their paper at the time notified.

You may receive one of these possible decisions.

Accept: You may be asked to upload final camera-ready files. A few paper will get Accept with revision. In this case, your paper will be accepted after you implement edits suggested by the reviewers. You will be asked to provide a revised version.